Little Big Master (五個小孩的校長)
![]() |
Credit: Apple Daily
|
The Little Big Master is premiered on March 2015. With cast Miriam Yeung and Louis Koo as
main character, this movie was inspired by real story of a kindergarten
principle, Lui Wai-hung.
Unlike many other movies in Hong Kong, this movie mostly
omits the cityscape. Instead, it puts lot more emphasis on rural scape while the
city life becomes secondary. From the background of those five children’s
parents, they also reflects the social reality of decoding countryside, marginalised
ethnic minorities and exploited grassroot employees. While all these are happening
in real life, the rural village and kindergarten shelter students and their
parents from harshness. The Cantonese version of Auld Lang Syne ends this
movie. It is frequently used for school graduation ceremony in Hong Kong. Such
common practice tries to recall collective memories in school life and good old
days. This rural life is something that city dwellers dream for and they find
satisfaction from this movie.
This movie’s genre is more likely a memoir or biography that
narrates the education experience of Principle Lui. Through the third person narrative,
we can explore the underneath mind of Lui and her students. The planned closure
of Yuen Tin Kindergarten widely spread as they tried to hire a “multi-tasking”
principle in just four thousand Hong Kong dollars salary. On one hand, genre
gives a channel for framing context which assist readers’ understanding on the
movie (Chandler 1980). Before watching the movie, film title and leaflet give a
general idea of this film. This helps to coordinate viewers’ choice and
expectation, similar to Corner suggested (1991). On the other hand, Louis Koo,
who mostly appears in crime and comedy films, give a contradictory but fresh
impression to the audience. The role of Koo helps audience to explore the mind
of the principle.
Chandler also assets that genres offered various emotional pleasures, including
empathy and escapism (1997). In this movie, the producer tries to highlight the simple
and innovative education in rural kindergarten and contrast it with the harsh
and highly-competitive city life in Hong Kong. While every citizen is living at
the bottom of a hierarchical society, the movie tries to be optimistic on the
next generation, despite the society pressurized children to be success. The
empathy on marginalized and minorities children also elevates viewers’ involvement
and engagement in this movie. Especially in the movie, when students ask their
parents what their dream are, they immediately refuses to speak out because of
unrealistic and childish. But
eventually, they are willing to tell because of their children. This reminds
all audience that everyone once has their dream, but because of city reality
and personal ability, it does not come true. Still, this film tries to bring
out the message that it is nothing wrong to have dream.
Chandler, D. (1997). Introduction to genre theory. Retrieved from http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/intgenre/chandler_genre_theory.pdf
Chna Wing Hong (10554213/21620317)



Dear Wing Hong, There is effort putting on referencing theoretical terms in your discussion of the film. Regarding genre, the quote and ideas are general although they are correct. It is good to elaborate it by anlaysing why the genre of the film (i.e. drama or inspirational) works in Hong Kong in the last paragraph. Try to briefly point out the strengths and weaknesses of such genre, e.g. the stereotypical or subversive images. This could make the discussion more substantial.
回覆刪除