Film review –Office

Office which is directed by Johnnie To is a 2015 Hong Kong musical comedy-drama
film. Chow Yun –fat and Sylvia Chang are the leading actors and actresses. Office
is talking about a billion-dollar company Jones & Sunn wanting to go
public, but it is hit by subprime mortgage crisis and the financial crisis. Finally, the company is
fail to go public because of seniors’ greedy and quirkiness. The film also presents that everyone wants to
catch and achieve their dream.
However, only a few people can succeed and most of them will get lost.
“Collective memory is not a given but rather a socially constructed
notion” (Halbwachs & Coser, 1992, p.22). Therefore, if individuals have
those memory, they are as group members (Halbwachs, 1980). The setting of the
film is in 2008, the company is suffered from the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers.
Many employees are living in a fearful atmosphere because they are scared the volatile
stock market and afraid they will be demoted, or even be laid off. In Hong Kong, the bankruptcy of Lehman
Brothers is one of the HongKongers’ collective memories. Hong Kong was a region
to issue the largest mini-bond and it caused numerous people lost their life
savings. Many victims held protests to criticize the opacity of the banks'
operations and called for refunds for several years. Some collective memories are
added in this film in order to arouse the resonance among the audience.
Individuals construct their identities through discourse and
participation in social practices (Auer, 2007, p.59). In this film, most of the
staff catch trains, squeeze into overcrowded trains, walk as fast as possible
and spend lots of their time to work. Some employees hope to have an
opportunities for upward mobility so they always work day and night, compare
their work performance with others and face lots of pressure. In order to
reduce pressure, females tend to spend their salary to buy luxury goods,
whereas males prefer spend their time to have a drink after work. These
behaviors are totally reflecting today Hong Kong society which is a hustle and
bustle city. Hong Kong people are used to talk, eat and walk quickly so as to
finish their work as soon as possible. Therefore, Hong Kong people’s identities
are constructed by the participation in social practices.
Andrew Sarris pointed out that a director tends to present his or her
own ideals, style and thoughts on the films (Barrett, 1973) . However, in this
film, it less shows auteur theory. Although Johnnie To is director, the story
is mainly created by Sylvia Chang. Johnnie To favors shooting crime
films, but Office is not mainly focusing on crime. For the auteur’s style, it
seems like Sylvia Chang’s style because she loves performing stage dramas and
singing. Thus, Office is a musical stage drama and includes lots of songs.
To conclude, the film maker tends to use collective memory to arouse
the resonance among the audience. The film also stress that Hong Kong people
can construct their identities through the participation in social practices. However,
Office is not very clear to show auteur theory because it seems not like director’s
style.
References
Auer, P. (2007). Style and social
identities: Alternative approaches to linguistic heterogeneity (Vol. 18).
Walter de Gruyter.
Barrett, G. (1973). Andrew Sarris
Interview: October 16, 1972 (Part One). Literature/Film Quarterly,
195-205.
Halbwachs, M. (1980). The collective
memory. Harper & Row.
Halbwachs, M., & Coser, L. A. (1992).
On collective memory. University of Chicago Press.
Chui Ka Ki
10621155, 21621565
Dear Ka Ki, There is an attempt to pull in many different concepts in this film review. Nevertheless, the mentioning of collective memory at the end cannot be related to your previous points. The inclusion of auteur theory is also weird. There is a brief review of Sarris' theory and then there is a "conclusion" that the film cannot show director's style. The linkage with other arguments is missing and no clear explanation why the film cannot show the director's style. The part on cultural identity is fine. As this seems not to be the theme of the film, you'd better explain very briefly why this is worth discussing.
回覆刪除